@Article{RozanteRamiFernVila:2020:PePrPr,
author = "Rozante, Jos{\'e} Roberto and Ramirez Gutierrez, Enver and
Fernandes, Alex de Almeida and Vila, Daniel Alejandro",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Performance of precipitation products obtained from combinations
of satellite and surface observations",
journal = "International Journal of Remote Sensing",
year = "2020",
volume = "41",
number = "19",
pages = "7585--7604",
abstract = "Knowing the spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation is
undoubtedly important for planning various economic/social
activities, such as agriculture, livestock, and energy production.
The coarse observation density over certain regions may
significantly compromise the quality of precipitation products
interpolated by only surface observations. To minimize the lack of
observations over certain regions, the Centre for Weather Forecast
and Climate Studies (CPTEC) of National Institute for Space
Research (INPE) developed two types of blended precipitation
products, namely, the Combined Scheme (CoSch) and MERGE, which
combine observed precipitation data with satellite estimates on a
daily scale. To understand how different blending methodologies
impact the final results, a comparison of each algorithm with
independent rain gauges was performed with a focus over the
Brazilian territory. Both products were generated at a 10-km
horizontal resolution using input data from the Global
Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE
Retrievals for GPM (IMERG-Early) for product (Version 5) in
conjunction with surface observations from Surface Synoptic
Observations (SYNOP), data collection platforms (DCPs) and data
from regional meteorological centres. The cumulative 24-hour
precipitation was evaluated for the period from June 2014 to June
2017. The results show that both products reliably characterize
the precipitation regimes over most of the study regions, although
MERGE and CoSch tend to over- and underestimate the amount of
precipitation, respectively. However, the magnitude of the Bias
achieved by MERGE is smaller than that achieved by CoSch. Overall,
MERGE outperforms CoSch when analysing rain/no rain and light to
moderate rainfall (0.5 to 20.0 mm). For heavy precipitation (>35.0
mm), the performance of both products is similar. The most
significant differences between the two products occur over the
Northeast Region of Brazil (R3 and R4), where CoSch tends to
encounter difficulties characterizing the precipitation regime
during the northeastern wet period (April November). In R3 and R4,
MERGE relies more on surface observations, whereas CoSch relies on
GPM-IMERG-Early, which could be associated with the deficiency of
GPM-IMERG-Early in estimating the amount of precipitation
associated with warm clouds.",
doi = "10.1080/01431161.2020.1763504",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1763504",
issn = "0143-1161",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Performance of precipitation products obtained from combinations
of satellite and surface observations.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}